Warth Park Judicial Review Application Refused

East Northamptonshire Council have released a statement today after a high court judge refused the application of the Warth Park Opposition Groups (WPOG) application for a judicial review regarding the decision to allow the Warth Park development to go ahead

“East Northamptonshire Council welcomed the decision made on Tuesday, 31 October that the potential Judicial Review of the decision to grant planning permission on 29 March 2017 for the expansion of the Howdens facility at Warth Park, Raunds (ref ENC/16/ 02119/FUL) has not been given permission to proceed.

 Applying for a Judicial Review of the council’s decision, the Claimant argued that the members of the planning committee had been misled as to the weight which could be applied to an emerging Neighbourhood Plan Policy.

Refusing the application at an oral renewal hearing, the High Court judge stated that she did not accept the claimant’s submission that members were misled and that the Claimant’s case was unarguable.  She further commented that the officer report was impeccable.  The Claimant has the right, with seven days of the decision, to apply to the Court of Appeal.

Councillor Steven North, Leader of the Council, welcomed the decision and noted that it “Vindicates the conduct and approach of the members of the council’s Planning Management Committee and officers, in reaching the decision on the Warth Park planning application.”

The council will continue to seek to recover any costs it can in relation to its defence of its decision.”

Members of the WPOG are clearly disappointed with the result and have expressed this on the Stop Warth Park Facebook group where residents are asked to no longer add any funds via the donation page, as these amounts may simply end up being recovered by ENDC or Roxhill.  The Crowd Justice page has since been taken down.

It is our understanding that should the Judicial review have been accepted then there would have been further protection of the monies that were donated by the local community, however since this was not granted, the same rules do not apply.

It is now up to the Judge to decide if any or how much funds can be allocated to Roxhill / ENDC or whether any of the funds can be used to pay for the solicitors and barrister who have been working on this case.

 

 

About Mike Turner (Admin)

Mike has lived in Raunds since 2008. A graduate from The University of Greenwich in Computer Science; he wanted to bring more technology to use for the community and to interact so he created Town Voice in 2014.
Bookmark the permalink.

21 Comments

  1. Why are people against job creation

  2. Absolutely disgusted with the whole process and the lack of consideration that East Northants Council have given to the residents of Raunds and our opposition to this hideous monstrosity! Shame on you!

  3. What Claus was stated that had been breached in the court application

  4. What a sad time to be living in Raunds and surrounding villages, I feel incredibly let down, angry and so so sad for our town!
    Money and power odviously means more than local people’s objections, I only hope my children and grandchildren forgive I for one will not!!
    As for the promise of jobs and community improvement well I’ll believe that when pigs start to fly!!!

  5. Its not job creation they are against, they are against another green space surrounding Raunds being hemmed in by massive warehouses.

    • The land was originally farm land with limited access to the public. The estate has now catered for people to access walks and stanwick lakes. They will be planting this and adding more walks and access for the public so I don’t see the issues

    • Creating jobs yes but killing wildlife. Raunds already has warehouses and a new Asda which has created many jobs. Also need to think of residents living in Raunds its not fair if its all being places in that small town.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *